Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2025 at 13:47:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Genus : Bos (Cattle)
Info The picture was taken in a monastery's yard shortly after the cow had finished feeding on the chestnuts from the ground. Most of the featured pictures in the category depict cattles in wilderness, so the rural ambient of this picture is missing. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2025 at 07:28:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes
Info The two remaining (restored) houses of the village of Chaudun, abandoned in 1895 (bottom right), overlooked by the summit of Raz de Bec (2,385 m) in the clouds (Gap, Hautes-Alpes, France) created by Pline – uploaded by Pline – nominated by Pline -- Pline (talk) 07:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Pline (talk) 07:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Hi! I've fixed the gallery for you, you need to be more specific than just 'Natural', otherwise the FPCBot will not be able to place the image in the right place. Could you please check that I got the section right. I see that you have added a lot of sections to Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France, a great effort, but we don't add sections to galleries unless there are images in them. If they are added beforehand, they are commented out until needed, otherwise there is just a lot of empty space on the gallery page. Please see Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand. I will fix this, but please keep it in mind for the future. --Cart (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2025 at 06:21:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
Info Mundari boy burning cow dung in bonfires. The ash is used as a repellent and for cosmetic purposes. Cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting photo. You should add that background info to the file description in every language you know, but by "repellent", do you mean mosquito or insect repellent? If so, please specify that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Smoke adds an element of mystery to the scene. --Tagooty (talk) 07:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2025 at 04:21:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
Info created by Brihaspati – uploaded by Brihaspati – nominated by Brihaspati -- Brihaspati (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Brihaspati (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 22:04:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malta
Info Dwejra Bay, Gozo Island, Malta. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, and a really big photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 10:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 15:48:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Chamaeleonidae (Chameleons)
Info This chameleon is about 8cm long (including its tail). No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. Nice capture! The edges are a bit smudgy. Charlesjsharp, is this due to lens distortion or NR? JayCubby (talk) 15:53, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Done new version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fix, looks great. What caused that? JayCubby (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Probably NR settings not quite right for the camera I had at the time.Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Little guy :) --User:Wobbanight (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great camouflage and wonderful details! Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 16:27:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info The historic Goodwin Hotel in downtown Hartford, Connecticut with the 522 ft tall Goodwin Square in the background. All by Wobbanight -- Wobbanight (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Wobbanight (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good compositional idea, but the hotel is partly in deep shadow, both buildings are partially cropped out, and the photo is a bit too noisy to be one of the very best on the site. I'd suggest you try nominating this photo at COM:QIC and see if it passes there; it might not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 13:20:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A very fine composition with genuinely interesting depth layering! --August (talk) 13:55, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 02:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. IssamBarhoumi, I think the white balance is a wee bit off though. JayCubby (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- May be it is due to colors of the building and the surounding hills it seems a bit yellowish. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Effective composition -- the white mosque as the religious centre stands out among the mud buildings. --Tagooty (talk) 07:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 06:54:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice capture --Syntaxys (talk) 07:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Caught an endearing moment. --Tagooty (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 08:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:38, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong support wonderful -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:08, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 09:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:35, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 14:53, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Amazing capture! Giles Laurent, I've tagged two spots on the nomination page. JayCubby (talk) 15:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! The spots are just some flying insects but I will remove them tonight if necessary -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:09, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Done -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! The spots are just some flying insects but I will remove them tonight if necessary -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:09, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Sweet picture and excellent composition! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 06:49:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info All by Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:38, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support look like Chełmoński's painting, means more for me than a bird in grassland. --Gower (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I would never guess it is done on ISO 32,000. Good shot. --Mile (talk) 11:34, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, this lens has a fixed aperture of f11 and for bird photos I require a high shutter speed so In low light ISO goes high. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 11:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --User:Wobbanight (talk) 02:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail, good colour composition --Tagooty (talk) 07:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 04:28:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info created and uploaded by ElenaLitera – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 04:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 04:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:08, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 15:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 02:15:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
Info created by John Thomson – uploaded and restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby
Info 1865 portrait of Mongkut with the very ornate Thai regalia. The glass negative was rather battered, and there are likely still flecks I've missed.
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Hard work --Syntaxys (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed! I rather hate glass negatives of the period. Though they retain more detail than prints, they also become horribly scratched. JayCubby (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Question You did a great job with the part of the picture you restored, but why did you crop out so much of it? That seems problematic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, the parts I cropped out were too large to fill in by cloning/inpainting and too damaged (for me anyways) to recover the partial detail underneath JayCubby (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe you should put "cropped" or "detail" in the filename after the nomination is over. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, the parts I cropped out were too large to fill in by cloning/inpainting and too damaged (for me anyways) to recover the partial detail underneath JayCubby (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed! I rather hate glass negatives of the period. Though they retain more detail than prints, they also become horribly scratched. JayCubby (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 09:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --User:Wobbanight (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2025 at 01:25:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Oxyopidae (Lynx Spider)
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture and very nice work. --Syntaxys (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:32, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan Kekek--Famberhorst (talk) 06:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 18:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info created by George Wesley Bellows – uploaded by Trzęsacz – nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose This photo looks a bit different from the original, https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-5945978. Look at the very clearly visible large spot near the center of the sky in the original that is nearly absent in the Commons files. There is no good reason to have a digital restoration of a painting that does not look like that now, if it ever did. I would insist on using the original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- The large spot is a dust spot IMHO, not part of the original artwork Ezarateesteban
- Your opinion is noted, but you are not a professional painting restorer, and restorations should be done to the painting, not a photo of a painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- The large spot is a dust spot IMHO, not part of the original artwork Ezarateesteban
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 13:27:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United Kingdom
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 15:46, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 18:22, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Je-str (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)


Weak support Although it is the best photograph in the category, unfortunately, in my opinion, there is a bit too much motion blur in the main subject. Otherwise, the train is very well documented and the image is well composed. --Syntaxys (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sadly you're right, I've messed that up (a misguided attempt at keeping noise minimal). If you think it's worth it I could provide a color version of https://bahnbilder.ch/61244 as an alternative, that one doesn't have this problem (but I kind of prefer this one because the people on the locomotive are more visible). --Kabelleger (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- I would find the picture really funny if you had used a slightly longer shutter speed and panned the camera with the focus on the locomotive. That's often the way it is: you don't always have enough time to make the right decision ;-)
- Since the main subject is not the people but the train, I would prefer the other picture. Only the moving parts of the locomotive are slightly motion blurred, which actually emphasises the message of the picture. I think the b/w version is even better because you can't imagine at the first glance that it's a modern photograph. You should offer this alternative IMO. Syntaxys (talk) 08:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- I've added two alternatives. (According to the instruction we shouldn't have more than one, so feel free to remove one) --Kabelleger (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- I feel like the black & white one is the clear winner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- I've added two alternatives. (According to the instruction we shouldn't have more than one, so feel free to remove one) --Kabelleger (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sadly you're right, I've messed that up (a misguided attempt at keeping noise minimal). If you think it's worth it I could provide a color version of https://bahnbilder.ch/61244 as an alternative, that one doesn't have this problem (but I kind of prefer this one because the people on the locomotive are more visible). --Kabelleger (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose A truly beautiful image, but the motion blur — especially on the front part of the locomotive — is too distracting for me to support it as FP. --August (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 12:34:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Delphinidae_(Oceanic_Dolphins)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Looks great as a thumbnail, but in full resolution the lack of sharpness and compression issues become evident. --Peulle (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review but I think that this shot of moving animals is a sharp enough action shot. Also, most of them are underwater so you can't expect the same level of sharpness. Moreover this is quite a rare scene to witness and to me the wow effect of seeing this group of dolphins swimming while all perfectly placed in a photogenic manner in beautiful clear waters overweighs technical quality. Anyway I've just uploaded a sharper version -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I think its great shot, probably we dont something like this. Only i would put in portrait mode, but i know in drone this is impossible. Sharpnes is not questionable here, more than enough. And sea was so calm, almost no waves - morning shot. --Mile (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Sharpness is fine for a drone shot of animals in motion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. Nice work, good sharpness even notwithstanding the circumstances of capture. JayCubby (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)--Ermell (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, very nice, and it's sharp enough for me. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Kiril. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Outstanding picture! However... It's not sharpness but denoising that went overboard me thinks and he result looks like a run of the mill AI generated image (for clarity: I'm not saying it is, just that it looks like). I think I would have preferred a noisy version with more details that this overly smoothed out picture a lot more. But again, the image itself is fantastic! -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Done, not sure it's better but I just uploaded a new version with less noise reduction (press CMD+R with image open on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows to update the cache and see the new version). What do you think now KennyOMG ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 10:26:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info A reservoir Tazekka National Park in the Middle Atlas, Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 10:21:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Attractive composition and colours. Stands out from the traditional views of palaces in the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 10:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Distorted: the right tower 'falls'. Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I also believe that the perspective is not the best, because the POV is to close to the building requiring extreme wide angle. The tower on the right is too dominant. The level of detail is not the best IMHO, either. Lighting is nice. Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 08:11:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info The picture showing a wayside cross on a cherry tree depicts a typical landscape in my local area, which is strongly influenced by agriculture, religious beliefs and traditions. Created, uploaded and nominated by Syntaxys -- Syntaxys (talk) 08:11, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Abstain as author -- Syntaxys (talk) 08:11, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A good documentary image, but lacks wow-factor. The tree is a bit washed out. --Tagooty (talk) 08:27, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your review. To be honest, I thought long and hard about whether to nominate this picture. But then I recently saw that Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oberköst Baum Luftbild-20250501-RM-154644.jpg, for example, was successful, and I decided to present it here. The wow-factor is always a very personal feeling, but the technical characteristics of an image can be assessed objectively. I don't think this image is any worse in this respect than other nominations that are currently running. Syntaxys (talk) 09:17, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- This photo would be more similar to that one if the left crop were a fair bit more generous, but there are also more elements in this photo. I like it but have yet to decide whether to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I feel the same way; I think there should be a bit more space to the left of the tree so that the image radiates even more of the tranquillity that it already conveys. That's why I like this picture so much. I often drive past this spot when I'm running errands and sometimes I stay for a minute to enjoy this scene. Right to the left, there is a paved country road running along the field, but it would only distract from the composition. I chose the frame to be as narrow, or rather as generous, as possible. Syntaxys (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- I understand the dilemma you faced. Depending on the shape of the road, it could have been included but would have changed the feeling of the photo quite a bit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I feel the same way; I think there should be a bit more space to the left of the tree so that the image radiates even more of the tranquillity that it already conveys. That's why I like this picture so much. I often drive past this spot when I'm running errands and sometimes I stay for a minute to enjoy this scene. Right to the left, there is a paved country road running along the field, but it would only distract from the composition. I chose the frame to be as narrow, or rather as generous, as possible. Syntaxys (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- This photo would be more similar to that one if the left crop were a fair bit more generous, but there are also more elements in this photo. I like it but have yet to decide whether to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your review. To be honest, I thought long and hard about whether to nominate this picture. But then I recently saw that Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oberköst Baum Luftbild-20250501-RM-154644.jpg, for example, was successful, and I decided to present it here. The wow-factor is always a very personal feeling, but the technical characteristics of an image can be assessed objectively. I don't think this image is any worse in this respect than other nominations that are currently running. Syntaxys (talk) 09:17, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 07:04:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by CTIO/NOIRLab/DOE/NSF/AURA, uploaded by Fabian RRRR, nominated by Yann
Info This colorful web of wispy gas filaments is the Vela Supernova Remnant, an expanding nebula of cosmic debris left over from a massive star that exploded about 11,000 years ago. This image was taken with the Department of Energy-fabricated Dark Energy Camera (DECam), mounted on the US National Science Foundation's Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile, a Program of NSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory (NOIRLab). The striking reds, yellows, and blues in this image were achieved through the use of three DECam filters that each collect a specific color of light. Separate images were taken in each filter and then stacked on top of each other to produce this high-resolution image that contains 1.3 gigapixels and showcases the intricate web-like filaments snaking throughout the expanding cloud of gas. Image Processing: T.A. Rector (University of Alaska Anchorage/NSF’s NOIRLab), M. Zamani & D. de Martin (NSF’s NOIRLab).
Support The bar is now quite high in this category, but it reaches it. -- Yann (talk) 07:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:49, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. Plentiful pixels and striking color. JayCubby (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Jay. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support mind-blowing quality --Gower (talk) 09:51, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2025 at 05:23:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
Info Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, but it has now dried up. After hours of rain, the clouds broke somewhat and this special atmosphere arose.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 21:25:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Uzbekisan
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 21:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 21:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak supportIn my opinion the photo is nicely composed from left to right but something should be cut off on the right side of the photo because that part of the photo is distracting.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the photo looks better this way. But I'd add a little more sky and a little less at the bottom, to maintain the squareness.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 18:46:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1910-1919
Info created by Addison N. Scurlock – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice work. BTW Adam, I left a note on your enwiki talk page. JayCubby (talk) 19:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice portrait, good restoration, as always. Yann (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice portrait of a very important person in an interesting style, in that Madam Walker wasn't looking at the camera. The original was in very good shape, and the restoration got rid of some minor surface damage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 18:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A striking portrait, excellently retouched, and of exceptional historical significance. It shows her in the iconic depiction that became her trademark. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:48, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 17:29:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info Majestic church ceiling. One other FP of this church, a significantly different view from this one. created by Poco a poco – uploaded by Poco a poco – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Surely, thank you for the nom! :) --Poco a poco (talk) 07:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive and beautiful. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support It would have been great to have more light on the ceiling frescoes, but you had what you had, and it's a notable achievement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 16:25:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info created by James Madison Alden – uploaded by US National Archives bot – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 16:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 16:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Not with this yellow tint. Yann (talk) 17:17, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Pretty and interesting but sorry, just not sufficient image quality for FP for me. I think the digitisations of art that we usually promote are sharper and less noisy Cmao20 (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 11:57:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info View of the Rotenfels near Bad Münster am Stein-Ebernburg, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Striking composition, good detail. From the size it appears to be a stitched panorama? If so, this should be included in the image page. --Tagooty (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Done Good idea. Milseburg (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks. --Tagooty (talk) 15:43, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support wow Ezarateesteban — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:30, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Thought this was going to be one of Kabelleger's at first! Great quality, composition, subject. Cmao20 (talk) 18:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. It does look completely like a Kabelleger motif. I really like the rock face. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice photograph of a typical view of this area. --Syntaxys (talk) 07:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:22, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 14:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 11:57:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany (Section 'Saarland' will be added if this is featured)
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nicely done Cmao20 (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This really excellent abstract composition (I realize it's only part of one, but the part works as a composition, unless many details of larger paintings) combined with natural sky and shapes results in a really appealing photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Fresh. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan and Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 10:03:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Uzbekistan
Info Watchtower, Palace of Khudáyár Khán, Kokand (Дворец Худояр-хана, Xudoyorxon oʻrdasi). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful details Cmao20 (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, an interesting detail of the façade. I might be bothered by the crops if I read Arabic better, but maybe not. The sky is probably somewhat dark for 30 August 2025, 09:50, but there is no way I will pull my supporting vote, because the contrast works and the photo is beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan Kekek --Llez (talk) 10:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 20:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2025 at 07:27:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Emberizidae (Buntings)
Info created by Hobbyfotowiki – uploaded by Hobbyfotowiki – nominated by Hobbyfotowiki -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 07:27, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gallery and suitable categories added. Please remember to fill in this info in the future. --Cart (talk) 12:28, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral I really like the composition but I'm honestly uncertain whether the sharpness at this size is good enough for FP, so I leave it up to other voters to decide. Cmao20 (talk) 18:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Nice picture. w:Rock bunting gives their status as least concern, but we have no FPs of rock buntings in Category:Featured pictures of Emberizidae, nor do we have any QIs of this bird in Category:Quality images of Emberiza or VIs in Category:Valued images of Emberizidae. This species of bird is rather small - 16 cm long per the Wikipedia article - and I like that it's singing. I just wish the head were a little sharper. I'll think about this nomination, but the photo should be nominated at COM:QIC, regardless of how this nomination goes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I think it's sharp enough, considering that I can see individual head feathers, even if they're not tack sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 16:45:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1800s#1890-1899
Info created by Frank G. Carpenter – uploaded and restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. I sadly can't identify the location or train model, but it's a striking photo. -- JayCubby (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support You also can't identify the decade when it was shot, but it is indeed an amazing photo! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- More digging suggests this identical copy of the file was mile 44 of the Alaska Central Railroad. EBay thinks the photo is from 1924, and that it's a rotary snowplow. NARA thinks it's from 1917 – 1964.
- The Bundesarchiv has a copy of the photo, even! :File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-12838, Verschüttete Eisenbahnstrecke.jpg. JayCubby (talk) 03:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 20:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Big wow factor Cmao20 (talk) 18:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Indeed. – Aristeas (talk) 21:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:51, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Remembers me Murder on the Orient Express --Llez (talk) 10:11, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 15:36:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1960-1969
Info created by Unknown author – – uploaded by Giovanni Cardinali – nominated by Giovanni Cardinali -- Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 15:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 15:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting photo. I could easily be wrong, but I seem to perceive a vulnerability in his facial expression. I feel like this is a better portrait than the one of Sir Dyson. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:41, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I first learnt about him from the Paul Simon song. Fascinating man, a great artist. And a good portrait of him. Cmao20 (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Similar to what Ikan wrote, I feel this is a understanding portrait which cautiously intimates to the artist’s sensitive personality. And what a great artist! – Aristeas (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't even like Magritte's art, but I do like this portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good point. People who greatly appreciate Magritte (like me) might be biased and vote for the picture because they like the painter; if you like the portrait even without this preference, that’s a particularly objective judgment and suggests that the photo is really good. – Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- I do take into account that he is regarded as an important person, so I'm not judging this as a portrait of Joe Schmoe, though I tend to think it would be featurable as such. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good point. People who greatly appreciate Magritte (like me) might be biased and vote for the picture because they like the painter; if you like the portrait even without this preference, that’s a particularly objective judgment and suggests that the photo is really good. – Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't even like Magritte's art, but I do like this portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 15:23:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True (African and New World) Parrots)
Info No FPs of the genus. I think we only have 3 FPs (1, 2, 3) of flocks of birds in flight. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. Good capture. There is some very faint pinkish splotching and banding in the sky, which is noticeable without zooming in. JayCubby (talk) 00:40, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The sky is subtly blotchy and has even subtler diagonal streaks, but this is an amazing photo of the birds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Done The diagonal streaks must have been distant power lines. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 10:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wings of all the birds are almost synchronised - a rare capture! --Tagooty (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent! Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:48, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:19, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 12:23:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kuwait
Info created by Di7ane – uploaded by Di7ane – nominated by روتانا -- Rotana🦋 (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rotana🦋 (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Pretty noisy, but what elevation is this taken from? Also, are the white things all birds? That might be good to mention in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, Yes. They are birds. This place is a nature reserve for birds. Ahmed Naji Talk 21:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I this case I think the graininess adds to the sandy scene. --August (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not hugely bothered by the noise given high (48 megapixel) resolution. But I don't think the composition is outstanding, so, while this is a good illustration of the subject, I don't see it as FP. Compare to another current FPC which is an aerial photo that also has an excellent composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:11, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I was in doubt, for me nice image, good compo. But i put now some denoise, since Kuwait, which is very absent here, and WLM is over, also to inform User:Di7ane that denoise is made, but can be reverted if not good for author. @Cmao20 that image has similar problem, if you see sun reflections up, where reflextion is big, a lot CA can be seen. --Mile (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Mile, I see only a slight noise reduction, but you flipped the picture vertically! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Ikan Kekek I missed rotation, since i was checking pano or portrait mode before. I put 180° rotation so bot will do it. --Mile (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 20:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Ahmed Naji Talk 21:18, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose The quality is too low in my eyes.Ermell (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 11:05:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
Info all by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Анастасия Львова Can we add B&W color, since colors are not so interested ? I could add one option. --Mile (talk) 13:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- As far as it is an option, not replacing the image - why not? :) Анастасия Львоваru/en 19:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I prefer this version Cmao20 (talk) 17:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Like Cmao20 (see his argument on the alternative) I prefer the colour version. – Aristeas (talk)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The color adds an additional depth to the image which helps the composition. I also like this orientation better, with the blue skylight over the big bright spot below it. Having that big bright part to one side makes the compo unbalanced. --Cart (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support for colour. MZaplotnik(talk) 20:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Kelly zhrm (talk) 08:27, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
Info BW edition and in horizontal.- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Building interiors
Support Better for me. --Mile (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment To whoever close this nomination, please note that modern black & white photos are in a different gallery. --Cart (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment PetarM You applied AI NR after making the image black&white. Sadly, the AI programs have been trained on images with
chromatic aberration and added unwanted color fringing here. Could you correct that? JayCubby (talk) 00:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @JayCubby Good spoting. Check now. I also put some -highligths, + selective denoise, sharpening. For me, picture if good, could not say it was from smartphone. Also saw some others, good cell. --Mile (talk) 09:41, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I like both! --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I prefer this alternative, but I'd now like to see the photo in color with this orientation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:32, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Just tilt your head or screen. ;-) --Cart (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- I did my best to look at it sideways, and I feel like I just prefer the black & white version, but it won't win the day. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Just tilt your head or screen. ;-) --Cart (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I personally like the contrast between warm and cool colours in the other version, and I don't think black and white is an improvement. I may be outvoted but it's only my opinion :) Cmao20 (talk) 17:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 22:16, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Some buildings gain effect when converted into B&W, but this photo is not graphic enough to benefit from that, it just looks dull. --Cart (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 10:24:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Hobbyfotowiki – uploaded by Hobbyfotowiki – nominated by Hobbyfotowiki -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool head, and the composition works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:55, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support For me the composition is a bit tight, but I won't stand in the way of an unusual, interesting, and striking photograph Cmao20 (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 09:38:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro Stations
Info Entrance to Wittenbergplatz subway station in Berlin at blue hour. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Clear composition with precise lines, good sharpness, balanced lighting; aesthetically strong. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support That's a really good photo of a beautiful station entrance I know well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:42, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A good quality image, but it does not stand out to me in comparison to the images in the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 15:08, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant colours, symmetrical composition, and high image quality mean that this is an aesthetically pleasing presentation of this building Cmao20 (talk) 17:53, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – @Ermell: I would suggest to add {{Personality rights}} after the image description or license because the people are identifiable. – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Done Ermell (talk) 22:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harald Krichel (talk) 17:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC) Classic Ermell. I like the integration of people.
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 09:37:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena/Weather#Snow
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Elegant study of flowers in frost Cmao20 (talk) 17:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Whenever I see these autumnal flowers, I am struck by their delicacy and, at the same time, the abundance with which they bloom. It moves me how the snow now weighs them down with its own abundance, yet how they continue to bloom as long as they can. – Aristeas (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I like the subject matter and the details, but the composition and crops feel random to me, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose -- Per Ikan Kekek. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 20:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree Poco a poco (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 09:19:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Ornaments Andijan Jame Mosque Complex, Andijan, Uzbekistan. Made on wood. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. Very nice. JayCubby (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 19:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 19:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:46, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice Cmao20 (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and impressive ornament in very good reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:28, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 08:41:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia
Info created by Bill.pix – uploaded by Bill.pix – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very good scene. But first
chromatic aberration should be removed. --August (talk) 09:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- i updated the picture and it should be removed now MohamedBilel.Belhadj (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- I think CAs are still there. Please check the notation a made. --August (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good now. --August (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment The lighting is not good, those shadows spoil it IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I honestly like the shadows very much and I think this is a good composition. I would point out two technical difficulties - 1) I can still see a lot of CAs and 2) I feel like the whole picture is oversaturated. Not by a lot, but bringing down the vibrance a little would probably make this a better photograph Cmao20 (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agree completely with Cmao20’s hints. It would be rewarding to improve this photo according to them. – Aristeas (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 08:12:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Southern_Region_(Suðurland)
Info View of the Breiðamerkurjökull glacier on Iceland. All by me -- Jakubhal 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 08:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting glacier lines and subtle lighting, highlighting texture and on-site atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great mood. Like Aristeas' image a few candidates below, this one too is a testament to how good photographs can use flat light to their advantage --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This is a stark image. At first I believed it was a black-and white-photo, then I understood that these are just the real colours of this landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Not having read your comment before viewing this picture, I had exactly the same experience. I find this a very impressive landscape photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Julesvernex2 and Aristeas. --Tagooty (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Julesvernex2 and Aristeas Cmao20 (talk) 17:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:05, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 05:32:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Flowers of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). Focus stack of 28 photos.}}
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. Agnes, by any chance is there more capacity to reduce the highlights? JayCubby (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Done. Correction of the highlights. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Looks great! JayCubby (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive photo, beautiful flowers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good, satisfying focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice work and composition --Syntaxys (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2025 at 00:03:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Aegithalidae_(Long-tailed_Tits)
Info A long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus), c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Polinova (talk) 01:06, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The sharpness could be better, but the overall quality is good, and the excellent, balanced composition makes it a worthy candidate. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. The feather detail is great. JayCubby (talk) 16:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:37, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I am fond of these pretty little birds, which sometimes visit the bushes at the bottom of my garden Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 21:59:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Majbri wael – uploaded by Majbri wael – nominated by Majbri wael -- Majbri wael (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Majbri wael (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose There is nothing here that I'd consider extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice illustration of the place but not as good as your other nomination - I miss something outstanding in terms of composition or light - and the image quality again is only okay, with a lot of blurring in the foreground Cmao20 (talk) 17:45, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco + sharpness is average --Gower (talk) 09:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 21:30:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family: Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants)
Info A close-up of a double crested cormorant in breeding plumage. We have a couple double-crested cormorant FPs but none in breeding plumage. Created, uploaded, and nominated by Polinova -- Polinova (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Polinova (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Too bad the beak and so on are outside the focus, but this is good enough for me and quite a face! Someone should wear a face like that for Halloween. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting colors, like smaragd. --Mile (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice sharpness on the eyes but the beak is too big, bright and blury, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A shame about the out of focus beak but still FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 23:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support :-) Zquid (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 20:31:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia
Info created by Majbri wael – uploaded by Majbri wael – nominated by Majbri wael -- Majbri wael (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Majbri wael (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Very imposing and beautiful view. I do think the sharpness is not as good as I would expect from a Canon 5D Mk4, and I wonder whether this is a JPEG straight out of camera with a bit too much noise reduction applied - you might have more luck getting more detail out of this picture by going back to the original RAW file. Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 20:33, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 20:00:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose that stone machine in center lacks sharpness, overall it looks like leaning perspective. --Gower (talk) 07:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Definitely an interesting photo. I don't really mind the perspective distortions, but the unsharpness of the stone machine is a problem for me. I feel like the machine is one of the main subjects of this image and I wish it was sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 15:29:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus_:_Alcedo
Info A female common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis), c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty bird, good quality, nice light Cmao20 (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support We have 11 photos in Category:Featured pictures of Alcedo atthis, but I agree that this one is also an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:03, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 09:31:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support (ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 12:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC))
Support. Lovely. JayCubby (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Really nice. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Simple but very pleasant Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Ne znam šo e problem, ama nikako ne mi otvara komplet, a site ostali normalno kaj drugie, ama ovaa ne ne 1.pat, vtor veke. f/0.8 ? Kako napraj Save, pod šo ? --Mile (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Метаподатоците ги поправив (сега е f/4.5). А, тоа што не ја отвора во целосна резолуција е чудно и не ми е прв пат (сличен проблем имаше со оваа фотографија). Ја зачував како JPG и ја подигнав преку „Upload a new version of this file“. Оригиналната верзија гледам дека ја отвора како што треба. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Мислам дека го решив. Кликнав на „Original resolution“ и сега ми ја отвора како што треба. Провери како е кај тебе. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Da sega raboti. Se gleda gorska kuka, 1115 m. Malko secena e vo horizont, pak OK. QI. --Mile (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Isn't the roof a little blurry?--heylenny (talk/edits) 03:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- It seems so a bit in the shadowed area when zooming in. I have currently no access to computer but will take care of it probably tomorrow. That’s an easy fix. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Heylenny: I've uploaded a new version where the roof is sharper. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 22:02, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:02, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
File:Sipar archaeological site.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 09:23:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Croatia
Info Sipar archaeology site in Istria, Croatia. More info here. Shot with a camera suspended from a kite line.- All by ZmajiZmajiZmaji 09:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A lot of aerial photos don't impress me as much as most other reviewers because I feel that they lack an outstanding composition to match the excellent technical achievement. This one succeeds. The composition is excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! :-) ... Composition is hard when you have a camera on a kite line some 200 m above and you are not really sure what it is looking at - so you just leave it up there taking photos by itself, walk the kite around a bit, and hope for the best (this happy anxiety ("did we get it?") is one of the best things about kite aerial photography though - kinda like in old times when you didn't know what you got until the film was developed). ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Clear, well-structured aerial view; the kite adds a subtle but meaningful documentary element. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:18, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rotana🦋 (talk) 12:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and educational photo of the Kaštel peninsula with some of the ruins of Sipar (which is a very interesting site: see pp. 19–21 = logical pages 296–298 of this 1889 account and the linked modern description). – Aristeas (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Wow - the 1899 Geologische Küstenforschunge [...] is a great find! Wish we had it when writing the article ... Thanks! :-) ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome, ZmajiZmajiZmaji. Of course the information provided for each individual site is quite brief, but the author (Vincenz Hilber) lists all sorts of sunken settlements, castles, peninsulas, etc., that he discovered at the coast between Grado and Pula – many of which are likely unexplored, and some can be glimpsed in aerial photographs, e.g. the sunken peninsula Secche Sipar (p. 20 = 297) before Zambratija. Perhaps you’ll find some inspiration for further kite-photographic adventures in Hilber’s text … ;–) – Aristeas (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Wow - the 1899 Geologische Küstenforschunge [...] is a great find! Wish we had it when writing the article ... Thanks! :-) ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 09:19, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:02, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 09:08:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info Ouirgane (elev. 900 m (3,000 ft)) is a commune in the High Atlas mountains in Morocco. The Yacoub el Mansour Reservoir borders Ouirgane on the west. Note: no FPs of settlements in Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment FP-worthy to me, but please eliminate a dust spot in the upper right corner and a couple of fainter ones slightly to its left and just a tad down from it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the eagle eye, I missed those with the light clouds streaking the sky. --Tagooty (talk) 09:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The image is fine but I wouldn't consider it extraordinary. The POV is too low so that the river doesn't play an essential role in the compo Poco a poco (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 19:52, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I like contrast between the vivid green in the foreground, the earth tones of the hills in the background, and the blue of the sky with its delicate cloud texture. – Aristeas (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2025 at 04:13:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info created by Cacio Murilo/MTur – uploaded by Marquinhos – nominated by Falcão Alado -- Falcão Alado (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Gorgeous colours and reflections, but the sharpness is IMO borderline for FP Cmao20 (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agree. heylenny (talk/edits) 03:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 16:02:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Tunisia (no FPs of Tunisia in this gallery yet, a section will be created if this is promoted)
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Stark and beautiful. I would be inclined to increase the contrast a bit, as the shadows seem a bit flat at the moment, but all personal choice, it's definitely FP for me Cmao20 (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like the feel of this, and the light and colors are very believable to me with all those clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Ikan. Interesting place with special topography (see Google Earth or OpenTopoMap …) – Aristeas (talk)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2025 at 11:43:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Airliners
Info created by MarcelX42 – uploaded by MarcelX42 – nominated by LexKurochkin -- LexKurochkin (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- LexKurochkin (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cute, something I never thought I'd say about a big airplane. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, this is quite famous and deserves an FP to illustrate it Cmao20 (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --EUPBR (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 06:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tight crop but o.k.Ermell (talk) 09:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral I understand that tight crops are a convention among plane spotters, but to my eyes it ruins an otherwise great image --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the crop is way too tight. This is an unfortunate precedent for FP, the tightly-cropped style is poor composition, regardless of whether all planespotter websites do it. Give the poor thing some room to move. Acroterion (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Crop. Yann (talk) 07:15, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Definitely Poco a poco (talk) 10:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral as per Julesvernex2. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Crop is too tight, and as an aviation enthusiast who sees many airplane photos, the wow factor is not enough, especially with the bland sky and grass. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Percival Kestreltail, too tight crop. --Gower (talk) 09:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --User:Wobbanight (talk) 04:21, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2025 at 10:23:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Tunisia
Info The Mosque of the Seven Sleepers is a historic religious site located in Tunisia. It is named after the legend of the Seven Sleepers, a group of young men who, according to Christian and Islamic tradition, sought refuge in a cave to escape persecution and miraculously slept for centuries. The mosque, built near a cave believed to be linked to this story, serves as both a place of worship and a symbol of faith and perseverance. Its simple yet spiritual architecture reflects the harmony between myth, religion, and local culture.
- Created by Skander Zarrad – uploaded by Skander Zarrad – nominated by Hommi2020 -- Hommi2020 (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Hommi2020 (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I'd support if the crop at the bottom is improved (getting rid of the pieces of wall) and the vignetting is reduced (better if you crop a chunk of sky, I believe). Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- You're right.
- I've made those small changes.
- Thank you for your advice. Skander zarrad (talk) 23:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree that cropping the sky would be beneficial. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Love the subtle contrast between the white buildings and the beige barren landscape. The leaning, but still standing minaret is impressive. You could crop the sky, if you want, but please not too much, only by 1/5 or so, else the photograph would loose its remarkable feeling of expanse. – Aristeas (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree with Aristeas again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Skander Zarrad You EXIF (f/1.2 ?) is for portrait, but you still keep all background and so its not focues just on mosque. Isn't than better to make a crop ? --Mile (talk) 10:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- I know that f/1.2 isn't ideal for this kind of exercise, but given the distance, I wanted to use it to achieve both shallow and deep depth of field. I wanted to have the mosque sharp and separate it from the background. I did a slight crop of the sky as previously requested, but I think this landscape and sky are important to the image. Skander zarrad (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 18:59:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Domestic dogs
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I fail to see something extraordinary here. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It looks like an act of lawbreaking is being documented here, but be that as it may, I agree with Poco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Looks like an act of breaking some local rule. The sign reads "dog walking is prohibited". LexKurochkin (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I think it's kinda cute and funny, and good image quality, although I'm not sure it is outstanding enough to be FP. It is a nice photo and I like it. Nevertheless, the chromatic aberration on the dog's nose and mouth does need to be corrected. Cmao20 (talk) 05:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Thug life dog! --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose purple fringing, dog is not very sharp, nothing extraordinary except funny law-breaking --Gower (talk) 07:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 18:25:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Simple but satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 05:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 21:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very clear photo of a pretty chateau, but to me, this is just a good, pleasant QI, as there's nothing greatly inspiring to me about the picture, though it has nice framing and is viewed looking down a path, so I can definitely understand why it's getting support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Works for me thanks to the curved path leading to the building. – Aristeas (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 23:51:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info I think the muted colours are part of the charm here. Very elegant and painterly photograph for me. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special to me, sorry. Perfectly fine as a QI, but no great composition and not painterly to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, I fully understand this. Not trying to change your vote, but I'll explain in some more detail why this picture is special to me, for the benefit of other voters. I like the gentle curve of the path from the bottom left that subtly leads the eye towards the horizon. I like the shapes of some of the trees, including the one slightly to the right of middle that looks a bit like a trident. But most of all I like the colours. The contrast between the winter mood of the bare trees and grey frost, and the green grass and rich clods of earth poking their way out from the frost. It feels to me like, even though it's still winter, the world is promising to start coming back to life. I really like that. Cmao20 (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A very beautiful portrait of a typical landscape scene in Kraichgau. It invites you to leave the warm living room and take a walk in the fresh air. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I understand that at first glance the image may seem very simple. For me, that quietness is exactly what makes it special: the gentle curve of the path, the soft contrast between frost and earth, and the muted colors remind me of a Caspar David Friedrich painting (e.g., Afternoon, Noon) – calm and understated, yet drawing you in the more you look. A humble scene, captured with care. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Ikan Kekek. The crop looks random to me. Poco a poco (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The colours are special: in a sea of landscapes with perfect warm light, it's refreshing to see that a good photographer can also make due with crappy conditions. I can't see the connection to paintings that others can, but it does remind me of analogue film. Regarding the composition, to my eyes it's not random at all: the path starts at one of the edges and zig-zags across the entire image, and the frame is cropped at equal distance from the two tree trunks. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and thank you all for constructive comments. – Aristeas (talk) 11:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and others. —brainandforce [yap] 22:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support ZmajiZmajiZmaji (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 19:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 21:18:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created and uploaded by Royal Society uploader, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 21:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good portrait. I was thinking "Dyson vacuum cleaners" and I was like "No, couldn't be." But in fact, this is Sir Dyson Vacuum Cleaners! He literally invented bagless vacuum cleaning! Among other things he's done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A strong, well-composed portrait in excellent quality. It offers a clear and personable view of Dyson himself - and, for me, it finally closes the gap between the brand and the person behind it ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A emasculated, formal portrait with a false smile. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 15:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info The downpipe and the broken plaster produce an artistic effect that enriches the composition, but those two elements also make this picture tell a true scientific story. Namely, the wall area around the downpipe cracks faster because of the water ingress, while other wall areas remain relatively intact as they are farther away from the downpipe and less exposed to moisture. Typically, rainfall needs to accumulate over many years so that the damage is made through this effect, which can perhaps be better illustrated through a montage of multiple videos recorded over time, but this picture depicting the resulting damage catches the effect well enough. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This is an operating school? Seeing the thumbnail on FPC, I didn't think I'd like this photo, but it is a very good composition and also has pathos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- According to the school's website, it's an operating school for pupils in only two out of nine years due to the low number of inhabitants of the village (111 in the 2021 census). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Despite modest light, I like the colour palette and the broken plaster revealing the masonry - it gives the facade a raw, honest character. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Underexposed, andIMO not special enough to be among our best. —kallerna (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Kallerna: I've uploaded a brighter version by 0.5 EV. How does it look now? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, the exposure is better now. —kallerna (talk) 12:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry. I'm not yet able to grasp this Zen. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Thu 13 Nov → Tue 18 Nov Fri 14 Nov → Wed 19 Nov Sat 15 Nov → Thu 20 Nov Sun 16 Nov → Fri 21 Nov Mon 17 Nov → Sat 22 Nov Tue 18 Nov → Sun 23 Nov
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sun 09 Nov → Tue 18 Nov Mon 10 Nov → Wed 19 Nov Tue 11 Nov → Thu 20 Nov Wed 12 Nov → Fri 21 Nov Thu 13 Nov → Sat 22 Nov Fri 14 Nov → Sun 23 Nov Sat 15 Nov → Mon 24 Nov Sun 16 Nov → Tue 25 Nov Mon 17 Nov → Wed 26 Nov Tue 18 Nov → Thu 27 Nov
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
